A Critique of the Fruits and Veggies: More Matters Campaign- Tiffany Chua

Introduction
Infectious diseases have been replaced by chronic diseases as the major contributors to mortality in the United States (1). Cardiovascular disease is at the top of the list (1). It is largely considered a preventable disease and, because of this, has been the topic of many epidemiologic studies (1-4). Nutrition studies have investigated the effect of diet on cardiovascular disease and have found an inverse relationship between fruit and vegetable intake and cardiovascular disease (2-4). Along with the heightened focus on diet and nutrition, researchers have noticed the growing obesity rates in the United States, especially in children (5,6). As researchers have accumulated evidence supporting the protective effect of a healthy diet on such problems as cardiovascular disease and obesity, public health practitioners have designed programs to help fight these diseases. This critique will discuss a public health intervention that has attempted to improve people’s health by encouraging consumption of more fruits and vegetables. However, it is unlikely that the program will be able to realize its goals due to innate flaws in its design.

Fruits and Veggies: More Matters
Fruits and Veggies: More Matters is a public health intervention program that is run by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), Produce for Better Health (PBH), and several other entities including industry and nonprofit organizations (7). It launched on March 19, 2007 as part of the National Fruit and Vegetable Program and replaced the 5 A Day program under the National Fruit & Vegetable for Better Health (7). The 5 A Day program had been in effect since 1988, but in 2005 the Dietary Guidelines for Americans published a report that increased the recommended daily servings of fruits and vegetables from 5 servings to 5-13 servings (8,9). The mission of the Fruits and Veggies: More Matters program is to encourage people to eat more fruits and vegetables through awareness and education (7). An interactive website is available at www.fruitsandveggiesmatter.gov (7). The website includes a program that helps people calculate their personalized fruit and vegetable needs based on one’s age, sex, and activity level. There are printable resources such as recipes and tips for eating healthy that attempt to help people incorporate more fruits and vegetables into their daily meals. Links to other websites that promote healthy eating are provided as well.

The Health Belief Model
The failures of this public health intervention stem mainly from its basis upon the Health Belief Model (HBM). The HBM was the first model that was developed to explain behavior change (10). In brief, it proposes that a person’s decision to change a health behavior is dependent upon whether the perceived benefits outweigh the perceived costs (10). Although there are several weaknesses of the model, it is frequently used to design public health interventions. Additional details of this traditional model have been described previously, however the relevant aspects to this critique will be highlighted again.

Three major pitfalls of this public health intervention are related to three negative aspects of the health belief model. One negative aspect is the HBM’s exclusion of social and environmental factors. A second negative aspect is one that the HBM has in common with other traditional social behavior models - it is designed to address behavior change on an individual level. A third negative aspect is arguably one of the strongest negatives of the HBM – it assumes that people behave rationally.

Ignores Socioeconomic Factors that Affect Access
The Fruits and Veggies: More Matters program promotes a nutritious diet, but does not address any social or environmental factors that could prevent people from eating nutritiously. The program’s website includes a plethora of information, from the nutritional content of a wide variety of different fruits and vegetables to different ways to incorporate more fruits and vegetables in a diet. However, all of this useful information is available mainly to those who have a computer and internet access as well as the motivation to visit the website. Studies have shown that the demographic population in the United States that is least likely to eat sufficient amounts of fruits and vegetables are those with the lowest household income levels (11). These families are probably also the least likely to have internet access much less their own computer.

If economically disadvantaged people do manage to access the website and are interested in eating more fruits and vegetables, they may not be able to buy the fruits and vegetables that the website suggests for two reasons: due to the lack of supermarkets in their neighborhood that carry high quality, fresh produce or due to the financial inability to afford high prices of fresh produce. In general, large supermarkets tend to have a wider selection of produce that is more reasonably priced when compared to small grocery or convenience stores (11). Studies have shown that there are fewer large supermarkets in areas with greater populations of low-socioeconomic families and that high price is a major reason why low-income families choose not to eat fresh fruits and vegetables (11-13). These are critical issues, because people will not be able to take advantage of the information provided by the program if they cannot find a market from which to buy fresh fruits and vegetables or if they cannot afford to buy those fresh fruits and vegetables for their family. The program does not address the fact that fresh fruits and vegetables cost more than processed and fast food, nor does it address the additional inconvenience that may accompany more frequent trips to the supermarket.

These social and environmental factors are significant forces that may work against a person’s ability to adhere to the advice of the Fruits and Veggies: More Matters program. Additionally, the program may fail to reach the very population that needs the most encouragement by heavily relying on their website to educate people. These failures were demonstrated in a study that analyzed the success of the HBM in increasing fruit and vegetable consumption in urban black men, a low socioeconomic status population at increased risk of cardiovascular disease (14).

Targets Individual Adults
The Fruits and Veggies: More Matters program should reach out to both adults and children. With the increasing utilization of computers in children’s education, children have been spending more of their time on the Internet (15). However, the Fruits and Veggies: More Matters website is geared towards adult education. In one sense this is beneficial since studies have shown that there is a significant correlation between a mother’s nutrition knowledge and their child’s nutrition knowledge. This is mostly due to the fact that mothers are their children’s primary care givers and play a major role in shaping their eating habits (16). This serves as evidence to support ensuring that accurate knowledge is readily available to children’s parents to take advantage of this strong, positive relationship.
In another sense, it would be prudent to ensure that children, whose parents do not play a role in encouraging their children to develop healthy eating habits, are given the chance to learn about the nutritional benefits of fruits and vegetables for themselves. One reason why this is so important is because childhood and adolescence are crucial times during which children develop habits that will influence their health behavior throughout adulthood (17). As previously discussed, this development of a healthy diet into adulthood may have long-run beneficial health effects with respect to cardiovascular disease.

In addition to excluding children as part of their target population, the program addresses health behavior change on an individual level. As we have learned from Dr. Michael Siegel’s lectures, the program could be more effective and efficient if it were designed to address behavior change on a group level. The benefits from such an approach would not only be reaped by the individuals who adopt healthier eating habits, but also by society as a whole. The costs related to cardiovascular disease in the United States are expected to exceed $475 billion in 2009 (18). Since fruit and vegetable consumption has been shown to be negatively related to cardiovascular disease as well as obesity (5,6), health care costs associated with these diseases could potentially decrease substantially.

Disregards Irrational Behavior
The Fruits and Veggies: More Matters program assumes that people behave rationally. It believes that simply telling consumers that fruits and vegetables are healthier and that they potentially prevent various diseases will result in their making the choice to seek out and purchase fresh fruits and vegetables. This, however, is not the case with most people. As we have learned from Dr. Siegel, even if people intend to follow through with the behavior – in this case buying fresh fruits and vegetables – it still does not mean that the behavior change will occur.
Studies have shown that even when people are aware of the nutritional content of fruits and vegetables and the positive health effects a nutritious diet can have, they still do not change their eating habits. In children, this relationship has been observed mostly due to the fact they have trouble perceiving the future and thus the relevance of fruits and vegetables to disease prevention (19). In a population of adult black men, perceived health benefits were not associated with fruit and vegetable consumption either (14). Another study investigating the influences on eating habits in adults, taste was the top predictor of what people chose to eat, followed by cost. Only in those people that the study categorized as members of a “health lifestyle cluster” was importance of nutrition a predictor of eating healthful foods (19). Thus, by attempting to promote healthful eating based on benefits from disease prevention, the Fruits and Veggies: More Matters program may only be influencing the decisions of those people who are already attuned to living a healthy lifestyle.

**********
The Fruits and Veggies: More Matters program is a national public health initiative that promotes the benefits of fruit and vegetable consumption, but suffers from three flaws that may prevent it from reaching its goals. It does not address socioeconomic factors that influence fruit and vegetable consumption. It also fails to appeal to children, and falls into the all-too-familiar trap of assuming that people behave rationally.

Being supported by a wide variety of institutions, including the government, industry and nonprofit organizations, the program possesses great potential to reach its goals due to its access to financial and political resources through its contributors. These advantages put the well-intentioned program in a position to create positive change in the American population.
Having been launched a little more than 2 years ago, the program has been re-evaluated at a critical time. There is little question about the growing obesity problem in the United States. A program could have a big impact in the lives of adults, but most especially in the generation of current youths who are still in the position to adopt healthy eating behaviors. In order for this program to effectively improve people’s nutrition across all ages and levels of socioeconomic status, changes will need to be made to improve upon the three critical flaws.
**********

These three critical flaws can be addressed by structuring the design 0f the Fruits and Veggies: More Matters program around the Social Marketing Theory (SMT), including aspects of the Advertising Theory (AT), and the Social Expectations Theory (SET). These are population-level models that are ideal for addressing a wide-spread issue like fruit and vegetable consumption. The improvements that should be made include enacting policies that impose restrictions on supermarkets, implementing school programs, and incorporating media advertisement to promote the program.

Increase Access
A solution which takes social and environmental factors into account has two parts: increased access to education and increased access to fruits and vegetables. The problem with heavily relying on a website to educate people is its assumption that its target population has access to a computer and the Internet. Even fliers distributed at the grocery store do not address this problem since people first have to get to the grocery store in order to see the fliers. Instead of waiting for people to come to the information, the information should come to the people. This can be achieved through mailed pamphlets. Pamphlets should minimize the amount of text and maximize the use of charts and pictures to make them attention-grabbing. They will provide exposure to the benefits of eating more fruits and vegetables, the costs involved with eating more fruit and vegetables, and ways to access them.

The solution to the second part of the access problem adheres to the SET and focuses on changing current social norms, wealth and inconvenience, around fruit and vegetable consumption among the low-income population to affordability and accessibility. Two policy changes can help achieve this goal: one to increase physical access to large-scale supermarkets and one to increase financial access to fresh fruits and vegetables. Supermarkets should be required to locate their stores so that the average income level in the regions of all their stores within a state must not exceed a specified maximum. This would require them to locate their stores in lower income areas that they normally would avoid.

The second part of this policy change proposes a tax on so-called junk food due to their lack of nutritional content. The taxes will subsidize the cost of fresh fruits and vegetables to lower the price of healthy produce in relation to junk food and make nutritious diets financially feasible to low-income populations. Industries affected by these policies will be adverse to these proposals. There will likely be heated discussion concerning which foods to consider junk food and thus liable to the tax. Thorough research will need to be conducted to determine a minimum nutritional content for certain foods. Supporting institutions behind the program will need to harness their political influence to compete against lobbyists that may dispute these policy changes.

Target Children in Addition to Mothers
Policy change, in addition to education, should be used to include children in the target population. The main reasoning behind the original program’s focus on mothers is because, for the most part, they are responsible for buying the family’s groceries and preparing the meals. However, the program should directly target children in addition to mothers so as not to rely on mothers to instill nutrition values. Some mothers may not provide their children with the environment or resources conducive to developing nutritious eating habits. This should not prevent the children of these mothers from having the same opportunity to learn about nutrition as other children.

A Fruits and Veggies: More Matters educational program should be developed and implemented in schools for first through eighth graders. In an article that reviewed the successfulness of obesity interventions based on several different theoretical models, population-level interventions that were tailored to specific groups were the most successful (20). School programs containing two key components will certainly achieve this goal. One component is interactive classroom learning. The Fruits and Veggies: More Matters program should not take the form of another lecture to which children must passively listen. The same article that reviewed obesity interventions found that interactive intervention is more successful than its counterpart; therefore the program should use hands-on activities to teach kids about healthy eating habits (20).

In accordance with the “four Ps” of the SMT, formative research should be done among the different age groups since a six-year-old in first grade will respond to an activity differently than a thirteen-year old in eighth grade. This research should illuminate how one can benefit from changing his/her eating habits, what costs are involved in changing eating habits, and the best ways to gain access to fresh produce. The second component of this educational program is requiring school lunch programs to provide multiple fresh fruit and vegetable options. Provision of these options will give children who eat school lunches the opportunity to choose, and thus practice, actually making healthful decisions.

One may ask where the program plans to get the financial resources to implement this educational program and policy change. Since these changes will only apply to public schools, a portion of school budgets that state governments allocate to public schools will need to be used for this program. Additionally, funding from the health care sector will be sought as Fruits and Veggies: More Matters is a heath promotion program that will result in cost savings in the long-run due to prevention of chronic diseases associated with obesity.

Appeal to People’s Emotions
The solution to the third critique of the Fruits and Veggies: More Matters program utilizes the AT. People’s irrational behavior concerning their food choices should be addressed in ways similar to those that conventional industries use to market their products. In a paper highlighting use of advertisements to promote conventional consumer products, successful advertisements have utilized the emotions of the consumer to help sell their goods (21). There is no reason why public health intervention should not adopt the same tactic for promoting health behavior change. The way that the Fruits and Veggies: More Matters program should achieve this is by creating a brand, a slogan, and a promise. The brand will be a set of values that appeal to both youths and mothers, including physical attractiveness and carefree fun. Commercials, billboards, and magazine spreads will feature a young, attractive woman. She will be doing something as simple as posing on a beach. A fresh fruit or vegetable will appear in her hand or beside her, but not as the focus of the advertisement. The slogan will read “You are what you eat.” The promise of being beautiful and carefree will resonate with youths and young mothers alike. The slogan will brand the program by associating it with physical attractiveness. In a sizeable portion of the advertisements certain celebrities such as musicians and actors will be used to tie the program in with mainstream values. These advertisements will promise consumers that they can look and feel attractive if they eat nutritious fruits and vegetables.

One criticism of this solution highlights the issue of finances. Instead of being funded by the government, these media advertisements will have to be paid for with money from the program’s contributors – more specifically, the industry groups that have deeper pockets than the non-profit or government organizations. Although they will be expensive, these advertisements represent a significant component of the program.

Conclusion
The Fruits and Veggies: More Matters program should be structured around the Social Marketing Theory and include elements from the Advertising Theory and Social Expectations Theory. Implementing policy change is an effective and efficient way to create behavior change on the population level. Modeling advertisements after successful tactics used in conventional product promotion will help the program appeal to the emotional side of the predictably irrational population. Incorporation of all the changes discussed in this paper will help the Fruits and Veggies: More Matters program become a strong public health intervention that will improve the health and wellness of our current population as well as of future generations.

REFERENCES
1. Bodenheimer T, Grumbach K. Understanding Health Policy: A Clinical Approach. New York: McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., 2009.
2. Hung HC, Joshipura KJ, Jiang R. Fruit and Vegetable Intake and Risk of Major Chronic Disease. Journal of the National Cancer Institute 2004;96:1577-1584.
3. Panagiotakos DB, Pitsavos C, Kokkions P. Consumption of fruits and vegetables in relation to the risk of developing acute coronary syndromes; the CARDIO2000 case-control study. Nutrition Journal 2003;2:1-6.
4. Veer P, Jansen M, Klerk M. Fruits and Vegetables in the Prevention of Cancer and Cardiovascular Disease. Public Health Nutrition 1999;3:103-107.
5. Wang Y, Beydoun M. The Obesity Epidemic in the United States—Gender, Age, Socioeconomic, Racial/Ethnic, and Geographic Characteristics: A Systematic Review and Meta-Regression Analysis. Epidemiologic Reviews 2007;29:6-28.
6. Dehghan M, Akhtar-Danesh N, Merchant A. Childhood Obesity, Prevalence and Prevention. Nutrition Journal 2005;4:24-31.
7. Fruits and Veggies Matter. Q&A. Atlanta, GA: Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. http://www.fruitsandveggiesmatter.gov
8. Dietary Guidelines for Americans, 2005. Food Groups to Encourage. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. http://www.health.gov/DietaryGuidelines/dga2005/document/default.htm
9. 5 A Day For Better Health Program USA. Origin of 5 A Day Program. Geneva, Switzerland: World Health Organization. http://www.who.int/hpr/NPH/fruit_and_vegetables/lorelei.pdf
10. Edberg M. Essentials of Health Behavior: Social and Behavioral Theory in Public Health. Boston, MA: Jones and Bartlett Publishers, 2007.
11. Cassady D, Jetter K, Culp J. Is Price a Barrier to Eating More Fruits and Vegetables for Low-Income Families. Journal of the American Dietetic Association 2007;107:1909-1915.
12. Moore LV, Roux A. Associations of Neighborhood Characteristics with the Location and Type of Food Stores. American Journal of Public Health 2006;96:325-331.
13. Powell LM, Slater S, Mirtcheva D. Food Store Availability and Neighborhood Characteristics in the United States. Preventive Medicine 2007;44:189-195.
14. Wolf RL, Lepore SJ, Vandergrift JL, et. al. Knowledge, Barriers, and Stage of Change as Correlates of Fruit and Vegetable Consumption among Urban and Mostly Immigrant Black Men. Journal of the American Dietetic Association 2008;108:1315-1322.
15. Becker HJ. Who's Wired and Who's Not: Children's Access to and Use of Computer Technology. Children and Computer Technology 2000;10:44-75.
16. Gibson EL, Wardle J, Watts CJ. Fruit and Vegetable Consumption, Nutritional Knowledge and Beliefs in Mothers and Children. Appetite 1998;31:205-228.
17. Douglas L. Children’s Food Choice. Nutrition and Food Science 1998;98:14-18.
18. Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion. Heart Disease and Stroke Prevention. Atlanta, GA: Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.http://www.cdc.gov/NCCDPHP/publications/AAG/dhdsp.htm.
19. Glanz K, Basil M, Maibach E, et. al. Why Americans Eat What They Do: Taste, Nutrition, Cost, Convenience, and Weight Control Concerns as Influences on Food Consumption. Journal of the American Dietetic Association 1998;98:1118-1126.
20. Tufano JT, Karras BT. Mobile eHealth Interventions for Obesity: A Timely Opportunity to Leverage Convergence Trends. Journal of Medical Internet Research 2005;7:e58.
21. David SP, Geer DS. Social Marketing: Application to Medical Education. Annals of Internal Medicine 2001; 134:125-127.

A Social Sciences Revision of Help for Today, Hope for Tomorrow – Jennifer Stedman

Breast cancer is one of the leading causes of death in women. Unfortunately, even with this knowledge, not enough women are proactive in their health and having regular mammogram screenings. Often, those who are getting screened are not even the target population. One program trying to promote breast cancer awareness and early detection is The National Breast Cancer Foundation (1). For several reasons, The National Breast Cancer Foundation falls short and does not have an effective campaign. The first shortcoming comes directly from the mission of the program. The second is a result of their partnership with Self magazine. Lastly, they have an ineffective Casual Up program.

MISSION
The mission of The National Breast Cancer Foundation has two objectives: first is education about breast cancer and second is provision of mammograms to those women in need. To accomplish this mission, they have laid out three means to reach the target, at risk population. One method is their Beyond the Shock educational video. The video is actually a tutorial of slides, covering thirteen overview topics, taking approximately forty-five minutes to watch. One of the first topics covered is the Risk Factors for breast cancer. The slide mentions that non-Hispanic Caucasian women are at higher risk than African – American women (2). This is a true statement, however it fails to mention that African – American women have the highest mortality rates out of any ethnic or racial group (3). This happens because African – American women tend to have their breast cancer diagnosed at later, more advanced stages when it has metastasized and there are fewer treatment options (4). Reasons for later diagnosis and treatment are a result of a few social factors including lack of health insurance, no follow up on abnormal tests or a belief that mammograms are not necessary (5). Issues such as this need to be address in the public health field, especially in visible campaigns such as The National Breast Cancer Foundation, however are often over looked and therefore reinforced within the African – American community.

In addition to neglecting African – American women, the video also leaves out the Latino women community. Like the African – American women, Latino women experience more aggressive types of breast cancer, which results in difficult treatment and higher mortality rates. Breast cancer is the leading cause of cancer – related death in this population. It is speculated that environmental factors such as working on farms may be a cause of increased rate (6), as well as social factors such as low-income status affecting their means of receiving appropriate health care (7). Therefore, even though the incidence and mortality rates of breast cancer are lower in Hispanic women when compared to non-Hispanic Caucasian and African – American women, they have their own unique issues needing to be addressed.

The National Breast Cancer Foundation also tries to portray its mission through endorsement. This can be seen on the homepage of their website with a video message from Dr. Phil front and center encouraging women to go for yearly mammograms (8). Even though the Dr. Phil television show receives high viewer ratings, the use of Dr. Phil as a spokes person severely limits the target audience. When looking at the demographics of those who watch the Dr. Phil show, the age and gender are appropriate with 66% female, 38% between the ages of 35 – 49 years old and 30% at least 50 years old. However, the viewers are also 88% Caucasian (9), which is the population of least concern for under utilization for mammogram screenings (10).
The National Breast Cancer Foundation also promotes their mission through the use of an online community. Both women and men of any age can register; identify themselves as a patient, survivor, supporter, or provider; find support or ask questions; and they can share their stories (11). Having the main forum for support and information through an online resource also selectively targets a specific population, which is non-Hispanic Caucasian. Within this group, 59.9% have internet access. This is drastically reduced for African – Americans and Hispanics who both only have 36.0% of their population with access to the internet (12).

The use of and access to the internet is also segregated according to socioeconomic status. Within those with a higher socioeconomic status, approximately 60% will have access, whereas approximately 12% within the lower group will have access (13). The same trend can be see between socioeconomic status and those who go for mammogram screenings. Women with household earnings greater than $50,000 had 82.5% report having a mammogram within the past two years; conversely, women with house hold earnings less than $15,000 reported that 68.4% had received a mammogram within the past two year (14). This demonstrate the need for new ways to promote education and support to communities such as African – American and Hispanic women who are not being reached through the current means.

PARTNERSHIP WITH SELF MAGAZINE
In an effort to reach more women and cover a wider domain of breast cancer topics, The National Breast Cancer Foundation partnered with Self magazine. The purpose is to allow those registered with The National Breast Cancer Foundation to have greater access to health information, how to donate to charity and how to make sure their money is well spent (15). This collaboration is, in theory, a great idea; Self magazine and Self.com are great resources for women to learn about having a proper diet, appropriate exercise regimes and other self improvement lessons. However, upon clicking the link to access the Self.com website or looking at the cover of the magazine, every image is one of a young, healthy non-Hispanic Caucasian woman (16). These images reflect Self’s ideal reader:
You're an active, educated, sophisticated woman who yearns to improve the quality of your life. You're interested in health, nutrition, money management, the mind-body-spirit connection, culture, fashion, psychology, fitness and the environment. If that describes you, then this is the magazine that will help you develop your untapped potential (17).

There is a narrow group who can identify with a statement such as this. When promoting breast cancer awareness, the target audience should be broad and encompassing, very different from this campaign. As mentioned before, it is the African – American and Hispanic women who are in greatest need for an intervention. If they were to come across this promotion, the majority would feel it does not apply to them. The prominent reason for failing to reach this group is because the campaign violates McGuire’s Communication / Persuasion Matrix, which focuses on the source, message and channel factors as a means of effectively reaching a group (18). The source refers to whom the message is coming from. The message reflects the core values being presented. The channel is the means of reaching the audience. As demonstrated in viewing the website and reading the description of the ideal reader of Self, the source of the message comes from non-Hispanic Caucasian women of higher socioeconomic status who are fashionable, educated and healthy. The core values of the message include nutrition, money – management and the environment. The channel of the message is through access to the internet or subscription to the magazine. It is clearly visible as to why African – American and Hispanic women cannot identify with the source of the message from Self magazine and The National Breast Cancer Foundation, no one looks like they do. Why would they feel this program would help them when the message is coming from a group visibly different than them? The core values of the message do not associate with the values of African – American or Hispanic women. The traditional values, which are held by African – American women, include communalism, such as the family and child centered, and spirituality (19), none of which can be found in the message from Self magazine. Within the values of Hispanic culture, the family is at the forefront and the mother is responsible for the home (20). These responsibilities become their focus and prominently include cooking and cleaning. Nutrition would fit within the values of the Hispanic woman, however because money – management and the environment are so far out of the scope of their daily lives that the connection will be lost. Lastly, the means to gain access to the benefits of Self are limiting. As previously mentioned, the women who are able to go online and login to the Self.com network (or The National Breast Cancer Foundation website) are those who are non-Hispanic Caucasian women in a higher socioeconomic bracket. This group is already going for regular mammogram screenings and living a generally healthier life-style. The women excluded from access are the African – American and Hispanic women, the group in need of screenings and healthier life-style information.

CASUAL UP
The last initiative of The National Breast Cancer Foundation is Casual Up. This program is designed to take “casual Fridays” in the work environment to raise money and awareness for breast cancer. It refers to casual Fridays as a time to boost employee morale and serve as a function to “increase education about the benefits of early detection and provide mammograms for those in need” (21). Casual Fridays have also become part of the norm for today’s youth, therefore campaigns involving this dress down day are automatically targeted to the young-professionals in our country (22). As a result, even though this campaign is beneficial for employers to take part in for the tax deductions and at the same time raise money for mammograms, the awareness is going towards the wrong demographic. Studies have shown that mammograms are on the rise in young professional women. Campaigns are now drawing attention through the use of young, healthy models promoting early detection (23). It can be understood why campaigns such as Casual Up are having an impact on young women when recent news headlines and medical websites covered Christina Applegate’s diagnoses of breast cancer at age 36 and her decision to have a double mastectomy (24, 25, 26). An occurrence such as Ms. Applegate’s is rare though and often cannot be prevented through screenings at a young age. Only 5% of all breast cancers occur in women under 40 years of age. Those that do occur in younger women are more difficult to detect as their breast tissue is much more dense (27). As a result, it is recommended that women under the age of 40 do not go for mammograms, but instead take part in regular self-breast examination (28). Therefore, despite a creative method, aimed at reaching a broader population, Casual Up may have greater shortcomings than benefits. The goal of raising money to provide mammograms to those in need is definitely needed. Regrettably, the group receiving their message from the campaign is already going for mammograms at too early of an age and should have its efforts focused elsewhere.

The National Breast Cancer Foundation, whose motto is “Help for Today, Hope for Tomorrow,” has great intentions of raising awareness and education in breast cancer and also providing a means of mammograms to women in need. Unfortunately, this message only reaches one, specific population and it fails to reach those women truly in need. The primary methods of execution through their Beyond the Shock video, early detection message from Dr. Phil and on-line community forum are only reaching women of high socioeconomic status who are non-Hispanic Caucasian. Similarly, their effort to reach more women and promote healthier life-styles through a partnership with Self magazine again leaves out African – American and Hispanic women who are in greater need of public health interventions for breast cancer. Finally, the Casual Up campaign, put on by The National Breast Cancer Foundation, has a target audience of women who are under 40 and already, unnecessarily going to mammogram screenings. If The National Breast Cancer Foundation were to look at their methods of spreading awareness through Multi – Level research, the flaws currently in place would become clear to them and allow for the development of more effective and diverse programs. Their programs rely on individual – level models, with the belief that providing information will compel women into action. It does not acknowledge the reasons certain groups, such as African – American and Hispanic women, have more aggressive tumors and high mortality rates when they are at lower risk. The multi – level model would demonstrate information such as lack of access to health care, lack of access to the internet, or even lack of a spokes person who this audience can identify with. The National Breast Cancer Foundation has the potential to be an essential tool of helping women; it just needs a new mode of reaching those who need their help.

The attempts and failings of public health interventions, such as The National Breast Cancer Foundation, give cause for a new perspective to be employed in order to find a solution. The NBCF has specific shortcoming with their implementation of a few programs, including the mission of the foundation, their partnership with Self magazine, and their Casual Up program. The primary issues resulting from these ineffective campaigns are 1) targeting non-Hispanic Caucasian women and neglecting African – American women, who have the highest mortality rates from breast cancer, 2) delivering a message through an inappropriate source, where the viewers cannot relate, and 3) reaching a subset of women who are too young and therefore preventive mammograms are non necessary and ineffective for.
Intervention

A new intervention that promotes breast cancer screenings, especially for African – American women, needs to be developed. This intervention should be based on the Social Sciences in order to capture the underlying causes of discrepancy regarding the preventive measures used, and mortality rates occurring, for African – American women. An effective intervention would be similar to the Pepsi My Generation commercials. This works by displaying images reflective of a certain group. In the Pepsi commercial, the images spanned from the early 1900’s through to the 1980s, capturing images of youth, rebellion and communality. At the end of the commercial, the message of “Every generation refreshes the world, now it’s your turn. Pepsi. Refresheverything.com” (29) appears, providing the viewers with information bringing them together. This campaign works through Social Marketing Theory. The important concept behind the theory is market segmentation, which divides the population into significant subgroups in order to successfully delivery their message (30). The reason this is an effective campaign tool is because it allows the targeted subgroup to feel like they are part of something bigger than themselves; it is something they can associate with, feel an emotional connection to and remind them of the times when they were young, rebellious and connected to others because of these commonalities, which are values that are important to and resonant with most people.

By drawing on the methods used in the Pepsi My Generation commercial, a revised approach can be made in promoting preventive mammograms in an appropriate group of women. Similar to Pepsi, the commercial would have images and music reflective of an older population of women. The targeted women would be about forty years old as it has been shown that a women’s risk of developing breast cancer does not become significant until she is forty years old and that is the recommended age to start going for regular mammograms (31). Therefore, to capture the times of youth for women aged 40 through 85, the images should come from 1940s through the mid 1980s. The images should be reflective of all women, with some emphasis on African – American women, coming together, having fun, and being empowered. The end of the commercial would have a message, like Pepsi, telling women to band together, to hold on to the ideals of their youth and to go for their yearly mammograms. The commercial would then have a website to go to or a phone number to call for more information. By giving them the next step in action, it is more likely to “hook” the audience and be successful.

Having a television commercial is the most common means of reaching the population. Having ads in magazines is also widely used. An advertisement with one of the images displayed in the commercial and the message written on it would also be beneficial to the campaign. A specific magazine that should be utilized is Essence magazine (33) in order to target the African – American women. The reason this magazine has been chosen is because it was an effective tool in recruiting a large population of women to participate in the Black Women’s’ Health Study (32). By choosing this magazine, along with others to target specific groups of women, the campaign should successfully promote it’s message.

Becoming Inclusive
The first criticism of the NBCF program was the way it solely targeted non-Hispanic Caucasian women. This is a substantial problem as the women with the highest mortality rates are African – American women. Having a campaign promoting breast cancer awareness, but not including African – American women in the campaign is a form of institutionalized racism. The revised campaign, based on marketing theory from the social sciences, does not fall into the trap of excluding any groups, specifically African – American women. By utilizing resources such as Essence magazine, which already reaches out and connects with the target population, the campaign is able to get through to these women. Essence magazine is committed to understanding its audience and as a result commissioned a study to define the micro-demographics among black women (34). The study is designed to help effectively advertise for products sold to black women; however the ways the advertisements are designed should also be applied to public health campaigns. The six mini-demographics described represent different values and ideals that are held by different percentages of African – American women. By knowing what values to appeal to the more likely it is that the campaign will be successful, whether for a product or for public health.

Promoting with an appropriate source
The second criticism of the NBCF program was the delivery of their message from an inappropriate source. The messengers were only white women and therefore the African – American women, who are at the greatest risk for mortality from breast cancer, cannot relate to the message. This violates McGuire’s communication / persuasion matrix from the social sciences communications theory (35). This revised approach does not violate the communication / persuasion matrix through the images it displays of all types of women through the generations. The message is coming from someone who resembles the viewer, no matter her background. Every woman has a history and every woman has been a youth. Therefore, by capturing images of different women through out the designated time periods, this becomes an inclusive campaign for the target audience.

Reaching an older age group
The third criticism of the NBCF was due to the programs reaching an audience who should not yet be going for mammograms because they are still too young. The young audience occurred as a result of the Casual UP promotion in the work place. Attracting a younger population should not be an issue for the social science based intervention. By using images that only pertain to the target group’s youth, the images would not apply to younger women and therefore would not appeal to them in the same way. They might find the commercial or magazine ad interesting, but they will not feel the connection with it that the intended group of women, ages 40 and up, will feel. The intended group will have lived through the images shown and experienced the emotions associated with it. This should also be effective as it takes advantage of the social science’s framing theory which centers the message on the core values of the viewer in order to make it appealing (36). For this campaign, the values are reflective of the women’s youth and empowerment. This should trigger a connection to the commercial through shared experiences and subsequently should have positive results influencing these women to engage in preventive mammograms.
The methodology of the revised campaign should be effective in promoting preventive mammography to all women, but especially African – American women. The design of the campaign is group – level, rather than individual – level. This means it acknowledges that groups are different than a simple collection of individuals; it allows for groups of individuals to be effected at the same time; it accounts that behavioral decisions are dynamic and that people can change their mind instantaneously; and it acknowledges that behavior is irrational, not planned or reasoned.

This intervention does have limitations. It does not take into account funding for a campaign such as this. Perhaps if this were to be implemented by an existing program, the funding would be available. An ideal program to do this would be the Susan G. Komen Circle of Promise, which is designed to engage African – American women in their fight against breast cancer (37). Another limitation involves the higher – level factors that might also be preventing African – American women from participating in preventive mammography. One factor that may cause this is a distrust of the medical field within the community. This campaign does not account for this high – level factor, however by focusing on this group and finding a way to connect to these women, I believe it truly is a step in the right direction. Perhaps a pilot campaign should be tested on a group of African – American women to determine how they react and if it might be effective.














References
REFERENCES
1 The National Breast Cancer Foundation. http://www.nationalbreastcancer.org/default.aspx.

2 Beyond The Shock: A step-by-step guide to understanding breast cancer. http://www.nationalbreastcancer.org/About-Breast-Cancer/Beyond-The-Shock.aspx.

3 Breast Cancer Fund, Prevention Starts Here Eliminating the Environmental Causes of Breast Cancer. Breast Cancer Incidence and Mortality by Race and Ethnicity. San Francisco, CA: Breast Cancer Fund. http://www.breastcancerfund.org/site/pp.asp?c=kwKXLdPaE&b=84427.

4 Health Day, News for Healthier Living. Black Women at Higher Risk for More Aggressive Breast Tumors. ScoutNews, LLC. http://healthday.com/Article.asp?AID=625376.

5 U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. Minority Women’s Health, Breast Cancer. http://www.womenshealth.gov/minority/africanamerican/bc.cfm.

6 Breast Cancer Fund, Prevention Starts Here Eliminating the Environmental Causes of Breast Cancer. Breast Cancer Incidence and Mortality by Race and Ethnicity. San Francisco, CA: Breast Cancer Fund. http://www.breastcancerfund.org/site/pp.asp?c=kwKXLdPaE&b=84427.

7 Women Caring for Women. Latinas: Breast and Cervical Cancer. CharityAdvantage.com. http://www.latinabca.org/LatinasBreastandCervi.asp.

8 The National Breast Cancer Foundation. http://www.nationalbreastcancer.org/default.aspx.

9 QuantCast. Dr. Phil. Quantified Publisher Program. http://www.quantcast.com/drphil.com.

10 Callee, E. et al. Demographic Predictors of Mammography and Pap Smear Screening in US Women. American Cancer Society 1993; 83: 53-60. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/8417607.

11 National Breast Cancer Foundation. Join My NBCF. http://community.nationalbreastcancer.org/.

12 US Census Bureau. Computer and Internet Use in the United States. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Commerce. http://www.census.gov/prod/2005pubs/p23-208.pdf.

13 National Telecommunications and Information Administration. Falling Through the Net: Defining the Digital Divide. US Department of Congress, http://www.ntia.doc.gov/NTIAHOME/FTTN99/part2.html.

14 Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Breast Cancer Screening and Socioeconomic Status --- 35 Metropolitan Areas, 2000 and 2002. Atlanta, GA: Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report, 2005. http://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/preview/mmwrhtml/mm5439a2.htm.

15 National Breast Cancer Foundation. News Releases. http://www.nationalbreastcancer.org/About-NBCF/Media-Room/News-Releases.aspx.

16 Self. New York, NY. Conde Nast Publications Inc. http://www.self.com/.

17 Magazine Agent. Self. http://www.magazine-agent.com/self/magazine.

18 Kreuter, M. et al. The Role of Culture in Health Communication. Annual Review of Public Health 2004; 25: 439 – 455. http://arjournals.annualreviews.org/doi/abs/10.1146/annurev.publhealth.25.101802.123000.

19 University of Oregon. African Americans. http://darkwing.uoregon.edu/~gnhall/psyc459/africanam.html.

20 The Ohio State University. Understanding the Hispanic Culture. Columbus, OH. Family and Consumer Sciences. http://ohioline.osu.edu/hyg-fact/5000/5237.html.

21 National Breast Cancer Foundation. Casual Up. http://casualup.org/.

22 Meredith, G., Schewe, C. and Karlovich, J. Defining Markets, Defining Moments, America’s 7 Generational Cohorts, Their Shared Experiences, and Why Businesses Should Care. http://booklocker.com/pdf/2780s.pdf.

23 Kolata, G. IDEAS & TRENDS; Mammography Campaigns Draw In the Young and Healthy. The New York Times, 1993. http://www.nytimes.com/1993/01/10/weekinreview/ideas-trends-mammography-campaigns-draw-in-the-young-and-healthy.html?sec=health.

24 CNN. Christina Applegate: Why I Had a Double Mastectomy. http://www.cnn.com/2008/LIVING/10/14/o.christina.applegate.double.mastectomy/index.html.

25 WebMD. Christina Applegate’s Mastectomy: FAQ. http://www.webmd.com/breast-cancer/news/20080820/christina-applegates-mastectomy-faq.

26 abc NEWS. Exclusive: Appleate Underwent Breast Removal to Stop Cancer. http://abcnews.go.com/GMA/story?id=5606034.

27 Cleveland Clinic. Breast Cancer in Young Women. http://my.clevelandclinic.org/disorders/breast_cancer/hic_breast_cancer_in_young_women.aspx.

28 Author, Unknown. Young Women ‘Shouldn’t Seek Mammograms.’ The Sydney Morning Herald, 2008. http://news.smh.com.au/national/young-women-shouldnt-seek-mammograms-20081027-599b.html

29 NCCNeon. Pepsi My Generation Spot. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MFAF-bR6Y0o

30 Edberg, M. Essentials of Health Behavior, Social and Behavioral Theory in Public Health. Surbury, MA. 2007. (60-61)

31 Méndez, Jane. Boston University School of Medicine. April 15, 2009.

32 Essence Magazine
http://www.essence.com/

33 Cozier, Yvette. Boston University School of Public Health. February 25, 2009.

34Author, Unknown. Study identifies 6 micro-demographics among black women. Tapestry cultural threads of success. Rochester Hills, MI. 2006 http://www.mbcglobal.org/News2006-10-31-EthnicBeauty.html

35 Kreuter, M. et al. The Role of Culture in Health Communication. Annual Review of Public Health 2004; 25: 439 – 455. http://arjournals.annualreviews.org/doi/abs/10.1146/annurev.publhealth.25.101802.123000.
36 Jablin, F., Putnam, L. Framing (88-89) in The New Handbook of Organizational Communication. http://books.google.com/books?id=6fumvnF6BsEC&pg=PA88&lpg=PA88&dq=framing+theory+fairhurst+%26+sarr&source=bl&ots=E1NwqY7L3y&sig=fCDWKc01sSt0hARfRtEHljHcp4s&hl=en&ei=cw_6SYvJKYyeM9GGqa0E&sa=X&oi=book_result&ct=result&resnum=7
37 Susan G. Komen Circle of Promise
http://www.circleofpromise.org/

Informational Approaches Targeted to Promote Physical Activity- the Breakdown and Futility for Our Obese Population- Julie O’Shea

Introduction

A sedentary lifestyle or lack of physical activity contributes overwhelmingly to an individual’s risk of disease which has burdened our healthcare system. The lack of physical activity has been demonstrated to be a contributing cause of the obesity epidemic and may contribute to a decreased quality of health in the public [1, 2]. In the United States, heart disease and stroke have been the first and third causes of death for decades [3]. Also in the US, only 25% of adults report performing the recommended activity level (i.e. 30 minutes of moderate or intense activity on 5 or more days), despite the public’s general knowledge in the benefits of regular physical activity [4]. It has been shown that an increase in physical activity level may decrease coronary disease mortality by 5% suggested by a theoretical estimate of the US public health burden [5]. Additionally, physical inactivity is a factor and associated risk with some cancers [6]. Finally, the initiative from the US government, Healthy People 2010 has ranked physical activity as a leading health indicator [4]. Despite the knowledge of the importance of physical activity, public health initiatives directed at this issue continue to fall short in their impact and effectiveness.

Consideration of the Health Belief Model

Applying the health belief model, most approaches have utilized the notion that by providing health information for risk reduction of disease, people will be motivated to increase their physical activity and change their behavior [7]. This frequently does not occur. The Stanford Five City project is an example of a community based informational campaign that has been shown to be ineffective for this reason [8]. The use of the Health Belief Model, poor framing and lack of knowledge of environmental factors contributed to the failure of this community approach.

The Stanford five City project was a community health education program for improving the knowledge, attitudes and behaviors toward physical activity targeting the residents of 2 communities of California [9]. The dissemination of information promoting the benefits of physical activity was included in the intervention in a stepwise fashion over 6 years. Other parts of the intervention included news column, workshops, organized events, media such as TV segments and worksite and school based education programs. The benefits of regular physical activity communicated via educational messages were the key integral motivating factor this intervention was dependent on [8].

This intervention, which has taken its cue from the traditional Health Belief Model, is flawed on this level. The educational programs of the Stanford Five city project have been outlined in the tenets of the Health belief model. That is, if you provide the information of perceived susceptibility and severity of diseases due to sedentary lifestyle, the people in the community exposed to this message will change their behavior. It assumes the individual will have a rational weighing of the message of risk with physical inactivity and thus change their behavior from the intention they have formulated [7]. This idea is based on people making rational health choices and does not account for multilevel variables at play in the people’s lives that may or may not be altered. The barriers of incorporating exercise are not addressed in this intervention. A person’s time commitments to work, family and care giving are not accounted for or resource availability. The way the information was provided to these communities was based on the health belief model of severity and susceptibility. The education of the public was directed on the individual level. Although the campaign delivered the message on varied channels, it did not account for the environmental variables that could impact the individual’s ability to increase their physical activity. The complex behavior of incorporating physical activity into one’ lifestyle was not taken into account in this campaign [10].

Consideration of Framing and Marketing Techniques

The campaign used the benefits of physical activity and the promotion of health as the core value of the campaign. The interventions were not framed in a deep core value to get the topic of physical activity on the agenda of this population. The way in which the community viewed the behavior of exercise can be impacted greatly by framing through mass media images [11]. This campaign framed physical activity in a value of only health promotion and not surprising the public was not impacted greatly by the intervention [12].

There is a wealth of data that demonstrates the effectiveness of utilizing marketing theory and branding [13]. Consumer research regarding the population to motivate behavior change was not adequately performed in the Stanford Five City Project. This was evidenced by the lack of awareness to utilize framing, agenda setting and marketing techniques.

The framing and presentation of information in the mass media, which is inevitably part of any community wide campaign, can actually systematically effect and impact how the recipients understand the information presented [14]. There is no indication that any mass media research was undertaken or performed to frame the health information in a meaningful way in this intervention. When the community was receiving the health information through the various outlets, there was no dramatic heart wrenching or deeply touching aspect of the campaign that hit people where it matters. The health information was not framed in a compelling way in this campaign. When a person’s heart or soul is impacted, behavior can change. Although in the public health domain in the past, we have not discussed the heart and soul of the public. Advertising has been changing the way consumers purchase by these techniques for decades [11]. I argue that when the community wide campaigns adopt a more compelling and soul touching script of a core value of family, freedom or sex, only then will the population adopt health promoting behaviors such as increasing physical activity.

The Stanford Five project in the early 1980s did little to determine how to alter the people’s behavior. The research that was performed was not integrated in a multilevel system to determine other variables and factors that were preventing the participation of community members.

Consideration of the Environment

The health education intervention occurred in the two communities of Modesto and San Luis Obispo. The intervention did not include a multilevel analysis of contributing factors which discourage physical activity such as availability of a public park or trail system in these communities. Neighborhood features that do not encourage physical activity have been shown to consistently demonstrate an increase body mass index among residents of those neighborhoods [15]. The Stanford Five Project did not put on the agenda sidewalk or park renovation in their intervention. Without access or availability to a park or playground, families are limited in their ability to incorporate physical activity into their lives. In addition, active commuting to school can be an overlooked source for youngster’s activity [16]. The proximity of public parks to residential communities has been associated with physical activity. Parks are common places to exercise and park use and proximity to the park can be predictors of exercise level of the individual [17].

How one interacts with their built environment and the impact of one’s place can directly impact a person’s health [18]. How livable the community is for the population, the availability for walking and bicycling paths and neighborhood design can all impact health promotion [19]. The Stanford Five Project, although determined the community’s attitude toward physical activity with questionnaires, it did not analyze or begin to look at the level of the environment. Whether traffic, lighting or sidewalk maintenance had at all been examined, these urban design factors can be an influencing variable on the physical activity level of the population [20]. In a study by Craig, when university education, income and poverty levels were controlled for, the environment score, which included features of the neighborhood including routes, transportation, visual aspects, safety and crime, was positively associated with walking to work [21]. The environmental barriers to walking were not considered as potentially threatening to physical activity in Modesto and San Luis Obispo in the intervention discussed.

Conclusion

This campaign based off a health belief model approach, framing the behavior change in only a health promotion value and not examining the built environment and other environmental factors has contributed to its woeful results in attempting to improve the physical activity level of the population in these 2 Californian cities. The recent highly publicized increase in obesity rates and health care costs, although have put physical inactivity on the agenda, has not dramatically shifted the approach of what was performed over 20 years ago. Our profession must be innovative in their design and execution of a more compelling way to change the lifestyle of the population to improve physical activity rates. The approach of increasing physical activity in our culture must include policy of environmental approaches, outreach on a more compelling level framed in a way to have impact and must evolve from a health belief model of providing the information and falsely thinking people will change. The Stanford Five City Project took place in the early part of the 1980’s, it is a good warning for a more refined approach to take public health intervention to the next level to produce results and improve the health of the community. Our nation’s population lives in a high risk environment which the public health community must not ignore.

Written Assignment #4

Get Moving or Get Trapped Campaign

Introduction

As discussed, the Stanford Five City Project campaign, a community based informational approach campaign to increase physical activity, has been inadequate and ineffective. The following proposal could solve the previous flaws in the Stanford Five City Project and impact the public’s inactivity and improve the health and wellness of the community. My proposed intervention, ‘Get Moving or Get Trapped’, will be described and could unburden our system with the complications of diseases associated with physical inactivity.

This campaign will be different in a variety of ways. The ‘Get Moving or Get Trapped’ campaign will be modeled on the Diffusion of Innovation Theory rather than the Health Belief Model. The information to increase physical activity will be communicated over time throughout the social system. [22] Various revered members of the community will be delivering the message to increase physical activity for the diffusion to occur more rapidly and most efficiently. The program will not use good health as the core value, but freedom. It will frame physical inactivity as a form of prison, using ad campaigns and propaganda to change people’s perception of how they view walking and biking. This will be combined with a dramatic change in public policy and infrastructure and urban development. Urban planning will be incorporated into the campaign. The community will be beautified with parks, walking and biking paths and a reliable transit system to increase commutes without vehicle use. The mass media approach, diffusing the idea of increasing physical activity via community members, framed in a new way using mass advertising and the change in the built environment combined, will allow for the public to adopt the lifestyle change of increasing activity through walking and biking and be an effective alternative intervention.

Addressing the flaw of the Health Belief Model

The program will not be based on the Health Belief Model, but an alternative model, the Diffusion of Innovation theory. This model allows for a process by which the intervention will be communicated over time through various modes to the public. [22] It will be a social change among members of the public. The message of increasing physical activity will be delivered by high profile members of the community, who are considered a highly credible source. Typically when television ad campaigns are from a trusted source those members of the society are used as an agent for change. [23] In the ‘Get Moving or Get Trapped’ campaign multiple people will participate in the ad campaign on various channels to deliver the message of walking to destinations, increasing activity and changing their physical activity. The information will be diffused to the public and disseminated with this message in a continually reinforcing way.

The message of increasing physical activity delivered by these trusted individuals can be a very efficient jump start to any public health initiative. When a small subset of the population begins to adopt the behavior and increase their activity by walking, the initiative can spread quickly through the social network. [24] This efficiency can be dramatic since opinion leaders in the community can influence the majority of the public and facilitate rapid behavior change through the diffusion process. [25] In my intervention celebrities, community leaders and positive newsworthy individuals will be utilized to deliver the message to increase physical activity. The idea of walking to work, school or errands will be the main message to increase activity. This idea will be diffused rapidly by the opinion leaders since it will be considered better than sitting in your car in traffic. The alternative innovation will appeal to people and be considered a better idea which has shown to increase diffusion of a behavior. [25] The public will therefore increase their level of activity.

Addressing the flaw of Framing and Marketing Techniques

As the message of increased walking will be diffused via the ad campaigns there will be a mass media approach that frames the increase in physical activity not in a value of health, but freedom and alternative lifestyle. The commercials’ will frame driving, being stuck in traffic as being in a prison, a prison of your mind, body and spirit. Walking and/or biking to work, school or the store will be portrayed as a way to exercise your right to be free, your right as an American. The ads will show that sitting in our car is a form of oppression, a way to be trapped. The ‘Get moving or Get Trapped’ campaign will use the framing theory to change how physical activity is viewed which will impact the community. [11]

When the TV stations and radio stations begin to flood the airwaves with this campaign, people will begin to walk to work and school and increase their physical activity without thinking of their health, but their freedom. Their desire to not be trapped, not be stuck, stuck in the car or stuck in a body, will compel and motivate them to incorporate walking into their everyday life. It will become habitual and be adopted as a lifestyle change.

Addressing the flaw of the Environment

As this diffusion of this idea to walk/bike is rapidly catching on, along with the framing of walking as a way to exercise your freedom, the community environment will be examined and modified. In this intervention, ‘Get Moving or Get Trapped’, the community will be studied and areas of improvement will be targeted. Available evidence has demonstrated that if the built environment promotes biking and walking it will help create more active healthier individuals. [26] The access to bike paths, walking trails and recreational facilities has been associated with increases in physical activity levels. [27] The urban design of the neighborhood in the community can impact and influence how active the population will be. [21] In our proposed intervention a task force will study the community and perform focused research on traffic, safety, lighting, sidewalk availability and aesthetic of routes. After this information is gathered, any area without sidewalks or appropriate lighting will be redeveloped for more pedestrian traffic. If safety was determined to be an issue this will be targeted for community development with an increase in police activity patrols on foot and bike. A trail system which will link residential neighborhoods to shopping districts, office parks and any public transportation system available will be implemented.

Additionally a beautification program will be part of the ‘Get Moving or Get Trapped’ campaign. Flowers and trees will be planted in public areas to increase people’s desire to walk and enjoy their environment. The community will want to walk to be part of the growing group of individuals who are using the new sidewalks, benefitting from the changing community aesthetics and therefore their physical activity will increase. The feeling of belonging to a community can motivate individuals to have pride in their neighborhood.

Conclusion

This alternative intervention has addressed the flaws in the previous campaign in a skillful and productive manner. By taking advantage of the diffusion of innovation theory, the idea of changing physical inactivity will catch on like wildfire, especially with the advantage of key opinion leaders in the community. By framing the ad campaign in a value of freedom and not health, the desire to be free and not a prisoner will be more compelling then changing their physical activity for health reasons. Finally, by orchestrating changes to address deficits in the built environment, which detract from walking and biking, the public will change their physical activity level in dramatic ways. As described, the ‘Get Moving or Get Trapped’ campaign could impact a community in a powerful way to shift and alter lifestyles to incorporate walking as a way to increase physical activity and ultimately improve the community’s health.

References

1 Stubbs CO, Lee AJ. The obesity epidemic: Both energy intake and physical

activity contribute. Med J Aust . 2004; 181:498-91.

2 Williams K, Prevost AT, Griffin S, Hardeman W, Hollingsworth W, et al. the

proactive trial protocol – A randomized controlled trial of the efficacy of a

family based, domiciliary intervention programme to increase physical activity

among individuals at high risk of diabetes. BMC Public Health. 4:48 October

2004.

3 Goff D, Brass L, Brown LT, Croft J, Flesch JD et al. Essential features of a

surveillance system to support the prevention and management of heart

disease and stroke: A scientific statement form the American Heart Association

council’s on epidemiology and Prevention, stroke, and Cardiovascular Nursing

and the Interdisciplinary working groups on quality of care and outcomes

research and atherosclerotic peripheral vascular disease. Circulation. 2/9

January 2007; 115 (1): 127-155.

4 U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. Healthy people 2010:

Conference edition. Washington DC: U.S. Department of Health and Human

Services, 2000.

5 Powell KE, Blair SN. The public health burdens of sedentary living habits;

theoretical but realistic estimates. Med Sci Sports Exer . 1994;26:851-6.

6 National Cancer Institute. Physical activity and Cancer: Factsheet. Bethesda,

MD: National Cancer Institute, US National Institute of Health. (Accessed 28

March 2009 at Http://www.cancer.gov/cancertopics/factsheet/physical-

activity-qa.

7 Salazar MK, Cohn MN. Comparison of Four Behavioral Theories. AAOHN

Journal. March 1991; 39:128-135.

8 Young DR, Haskell WL, Taylor CB, Fortmann SP. Effect of Community Health

Education on Physical Activity Knowledge, Attitudes, and Behavior. Am J

Epidemiology. 1996; 144: 264-274.

9 Farquhar JW, Fortmann SP, Caccoby N, et al. The Stanford Five-City Project;

design and methods. Am J Epidemiology. 1985; 122:323-34.

10 Bandura A. Social Foundations of thought and actions: A social cognitive

theory. 1986.

11 McQuail D. Mass Communication Theory: An Introduction (3^rd

edition)Thousand Oaks, CA, Sage. 1994.

12 Schull N. Digital Gambling: The Coincidence of Desire and Design. The Annals

of the American Academy of Political and Social Science. 2005;597 (1): 65-81.

13 MacFadyen L, Stead M, Hastings GB. Social Marketing in: Baker MJ editor.

The Marketing book. 5^th edition Oxford: Buttersworth-Heinneman; 2002.

14 Scheufele DA. Framing as a Theory of Media Effects. Journal of

Communication. Winter 1999.

15 Black JL, Macinko J. Neighborhoods and obesity. Nutrition Reviews. January

2008; 66 (1):2-20.

16 Alison KR. Four Challenges in assessing the implementation and effectiveness

of physical activity and nutrition policy intervention as natural experiments.

Health Promotion International. September 2008; 23 (3): 290-297.

17 McKenzie T, Sehgal A. Contribution of Public Parks to Physical Activity.

American Journal of Public Health. March 2007; 97 (3): 509-514.

18 Glanz K, Lankenau B, Foerster S, TempleS, Mullis R, et al. Environmental and

policy approaches to cardiovascular disease prevention through

nutrition:opportunities for state and local action. Health Education Q. 1995;

22: 512-527.

19 Wang G, Macera C, Scudder-Soucie B, Schmid T, Pratt M, et al. Cost analysis

of the built environment: The case of bike and pedestrian trials in Lincoln,

Neb. American Journal of Public Health April 2004; 94 (4): 549-553.

20 Brownson RC, Baker EA, Houseman RA, Brennan LK, Bacak SJ.

Environmental and policy determinants of physical activity in the United

States. American Journal of Public Health. 2001; 91: 1995-2003.

21 Craig CL, Brownson RC, Cragg SE, Dunn AL. Exploring the effect of the

environment on physical activity: A study examining Walking to work.

American Journal of Preventative Medicine. 2002; 23 (2S): 36-43.

22 Dearing JW. Evolution of diffusion and dissemination theory. Journal of

Public Health Management Practive. 2008; 14 (2): 99-108.

23 Barker K. Diffusion of innovation: A world tour. Journal of Health

Communication. 2004; 9: 131-137.

24 Dearing JW. Improving the state of health programming by using diffusion

theory. Journal of Health Communication. 2004; 9: 21-36.

25 Farr AC, Ames N. Using diffusion of innovation theory to encourage the

development of a children’s collaborative: A formative evaluation. Journal of

Health Communication. 2008; 13: 375-388.

26 Handy SL, Boarnet MG, Ewing R, Killingsworth RE. How the built

environment affects physical activity. American Journal of Preventative

Medicine. 2002;23 (2S): 64-73.

27 Gordon-Larson P, Nelson MC, Page P, Popkin BM. Inequality in the built

environment underlies key health disparities in physical activity and obesity.

Accessed on 13-April-2009 at http://www.pediatrics.org

Food for Thought: How Public Health has Failed to Combat Obesity – Aanchal Sharma

Oftentimes, small issues that remain untreated can escalate into large scale problems. This is the case with obesity, defined as having a body mass index (BMI) of 30 kg/m² or higher (12). Obesity has now become an epidemic in the United States, where approximately seventy million Americans are obese and more than one in three of all adults and one in five of all children are overweight (3). Many intervention programs have been launched to deal with this public health issue. A number of the programs are aimed at improving the nutritional health of young children so that they will maintain a healthy diet into adulthood. Among these interventions is the implementation of a weight report card system for schoolchildren. This intervention has been proposed in different forms in various states and has met with mixed emotions from both parents and children.

The Weight Report Card

The general concept of the weight report card is to keep parents informed about the nutritional status of their children and to help them teach their children about proper eating habits so that obesity does not becomes an issue. The way the weight report card works is that the school measures the weight and height of all the students and then uses these measurements to calculate their BMI. The BMI is then scaled against what is considered underweight, healthy, overweight, or obese and these finding are sent home to parents just like an academic report card (4). While the goal of the weight report card is similar that of most public health interventions – to stimulate a change in the behavior of both parents and children – it has not been documented to have achieved such success (16). Nevertheless, the weight report cards did increase awareness among parents about the health of their children. The lack of success of the weight report card intervention program can be attributed to issues with stimulating an intention to change behavior, self-efficacy, and framing. Each of these factors has a key impact on how people with react to the intervention and whether or not they will be influenced enough to change their behavior.

Critique 1: The Inability to Create an Intention to Change Behavior

The weight report card does not create an intention to change behavior. Intention to carry out an action or behavior is an important component of the traditional health behavior models (15). Though intention does not always lead to the execution of a behavior, the existence of intention is necessary to have some sort of desire to change a behavior. The weight report cards are intended to stimulate a change in behavior that will lead to healthier lifestyles for children (16). However, by just pointing out the children who are overweight and obese, there is no true motivation to improve health. Furthermore, in cases where programs are offered to the children and the families of the children who have higher BMIs, there is a lack of intention for families to get involved because of the stigma that is associated with these programs. If the school were to offer to all of the schoolchildren a program that would have components aimed at increasing physical fitness and improving eating patterns, children and their families would be more inclined to get involved since the programs would be associated with healthier lifestyles, rather than only helping those who are obese or at risk (6).

In Wyoming, the school district that distributed weight report cards also offered students and their families an opportunity to get involved in a program called the Healthy Kids Club, which included a weekly exercise regime. Rather than having the intention to change their behavior and have their families become more physically active, parents of the children who were offered this program due to their high BMI were offended and outraged. They did not want to subject themselves or their children to a program that implied that their family was incapable of taking care of themselves and of making healthy decisions (6).

In Arkansas, the weight report cards do offer suggestions on ways to improve the quality of health, but there are not concrete examples being offered to parents (2). There is no acknowledgement of the fact that the problem may also be due to parents who are unaware of how to go about changing the behavior of their children. In some cases, parents may realize that there is a problem, but may not know how to approach the situation or may need help in finding a solution. Thus, it is essential to incorporate a component of common ways to improve the nutritional health of individual and this can even be presented through informational sessions at local schools or community centers. These sessions should be offered to any parents who may be interested in the issue and during these sessions, the parents can be informed of ways to motivate their children to be more physically active and improve the quality of their health. The addition of these components into the weight report card program could help create the intention necessary to change behavior among the target population.

Critique 2: The Concept of Self-Efficacy

Many of the traditional health behavior models include the concept of self-efficacy. Self-efficacy can be understood as an individual’s belief as to whether or not he or she can carry out an action or behavior (15). In the case of the weight report cards, it seems as if the intervention completely disregarded the concept of self-efficacy. By pointing out children who are overweight or obese, the intervention creates a division between the children. This can really have a negative effect on the self-esteem of the children who may be more at risk for obesity as compared to their classmates. This can also result in reduced self-efficacy among the children who are more overweight as they may become increasingly self-conscious and place greater blame on themselves for their physical condition. Thus, they may not feel like they are capable of doing anything to improve their physical health or may not be motivated to change their behavior due to the lack of positive reinforcement from the intervention program. In addition to this, children may be more prone to develop unhealthy eating habits or eating disorders due to the stigma that is associated with getting a high BMI on their weight report card (26).

Self-efficacy is an essential mediating mechanism in enhancing the understanding of the treatment of those who are overweight and obese (27). Research that assessed the importance of self-efficacy has shown that treatment programs for weight are incomplete without this component of the model (4). Weight loss can only be achieved when an individual makes an effort and feels like he or she can achieve successful results by altering eating patterns and increasing physical activity. Personal health care and management requires a drive that comes from within the individual, which includes a desire to change behavior and the confidence that he or she is capable of changing the behavior. Self-efficacy has a great impact on self-management and is a key component on one’s initiative to change behavior and promote healthy living (7). Thus, without the component of self-efficacy, it becomes difficult to implement a program to successfully help with the obesity epidemic.

Critique 3: Framing Obese Children as Failures

One alternative model for public health intervention is the framing theory. The framing theory is based on the principle that if you frame something the right way, you can change the mentality of a group and influence a change in behavior by appealing to the core values of a group (15). Proponents of the weight report card program may argue that they are trying to appeal to the value of good health; however, there is a stigma attached to a report card. A bad grade on a report card can really harm the self-esteem of children and may make them feel like failures. The weight report card does not take external factors into consideration. It implies that it is the child’s fault that he or she is overweight or obese. Like self-efficacy, self-esteem is a key factor to consider when assessing weight report cards (19). Obese children with decreasing levels of self-esteem demonstrate emotional problems and engage in high-risk behaviors, such as smoking or consuming alcohol (28). They are generally more disengaged and tend to exhibit signs of sadness, loneliness, and even depression. Research has also shown that middle school females who perceive themselves as overweight are significantly more likely to be associated with suicidal thoughts and actions, and for middle school males, perceptions of being underweight or overweight were significantly linked to suicidal thoughts and actions (29). If the weight report cards are issued in schools and boys and girls are being told that they are overweight or obese, there is a direct negative effect on their mental health and self-esteem. Thus, the weight report cards need to be reconstructed so that they are not as harmful to the self-esteem of schoolchildren.

Generally, school grades are meant to reflect the caliber of a student’s performance in class and are an assessment of their ability to do well both in class and on exams. Similarly, the weight grade can be associated with poor eating habits and lack of physical activity, framing the problem as a result of poor performance on the part of the child. This may be the case for some children; however, there are often biological issues that can result in higher BMIs for certain children, such as slower metabolism or a problem with the stomach, liver, or kidneys. Furthermore, BMI does not take body composition into consideration and therefore can misclassify someone who is healthy with greater muscle mass as overweight. The American Academy of Pediatrics conducted a study that shows that if one parent is obese, the odds ratio is approximately three times the normal risk for that child to become obese in adulthood. If both parents are obese, the risk increases to ten times the normal risk (20). The weight report cards do not account for these issues. Thus, the way the intervention is framed does not have a sympathetic tone; instead, it is rather critical and places the blame on the individual and his or her family and lifestyle.

Framing interventions in a particular way has a direct impact on the emotional response of an individual to the information being presented (13). The emotional response of an individual will influence how they will approach the intervention and whether or not they will be open to the information being presented to them. It is also important to frame the issue of obesity in terms of external environmental and societal factors in addition to the personal factors that the weight report card focuses on (14). For example, availability of healthy foods and socioeconomic status may be linked with why certain communities have a greater percentage of overweight and obese people. Each of these aspects of framing can make a great difference in the success rate of the intervention program.

Food for Thought: Where Do We Go from Here?

Even though the weight report cards are not the key intervention to help reduce obesity among schoolchildren in the United States, it still has strong elements that can be further developed to create a more effective public health program. The weight report card was effective in creating raised awareness about the issue of obesity (16, 19). This is a key aspect to creating interventions that will have successful results. Increasing awareness about an issue increases the perceived susceptibility and perceived severity of an individual towards a problem (15). However, this is not enough to create an intention to change behavior.

A better suited intervention program would stem off of the idea of using school as a medium for assessing the health of the children. Instead of alienating children who have a BMI that categorizes them as overweight or obese, the school administration should educate all the children about the importance of proper eating habits and physical fitness. Classroom presentations, healthier lunch options, and more physical activities for children to participate in are all components of making the school environment more conducive towards providing children with outlets for improving the quality of their health (25). By educating children about how they can better take care of themselves and improve their own health, there will be less of a stigmatization towards children who may be at risk for obesity and there will be more positive reinforcement to encourage children to change their behaviors.

The weight report card allows public health officials to realize how physical health is a sensitive topic that needs to be dealt with using discretion. Placing blame and framing the problem in a way that makes people feel guilty will only result in disheartened or angered individuals. Society and media is obsessed with body image and there is a constant emphasis placed on being skinny and how that is associated with beauty. Schoolchildren are aware of this image and are able to draw correlations between weight and lifestyle. Thus, telling children that they are overweight is not enough to stimulate the change in behavior that will lead to weight loss. The interventions laid out by public health officials should focus more on providing solutions rather than pointing out who is at need for the most help, especially since schoolchildren are probably aware of their health status in terms of weight. Such solutions can include programs that focus on better eating patterns and ways to increase physical activity to promote healthy lifestyles. By teaching children about how to adequately take care of themselves and how to make healthy choices, public health officials can lower the incidence of obesity among this population as they get older and eventually diminish this epidemic from the American population.

The LEAP Ahead Program: Live Happily, Eat Healthily, Actively Learn, and be Physically Fit

An intervention that would help reduce the incidence of childhood obesity would be a program that addresses the issue, while constructively motivating children to live healthily. The LEAP Ahead program is meant to motivate children to maintain healthy lifestyles without feeling uncomfortable and ostracized. The various components of the program address public health issues, while incorporating social and environmental factors. Furthermore, when working with children, it is essential to make the program appealing in terms of enjoyment and simplicity. The LEAP Ahead program has components that include multiple areas of the school and range from classroom lessons and exercises to more rigorous physical education programs and more nutritious meal options in the cafeterias. Similar to the LEAP Ahead program is the Planet Health Intervention, which was successfully applied in school settings and provides evidence that school-based approaches are effective in preventing or reducing obesity among schoolchildren (30). The LEAP Ahead Program is meant to be implemented at the school level so that its components fit into the academic curriculum and the physical education and recreational departments. This intervention is intended to enhance the school environment and make it more conducive to healthy living.

Live Happily: Promoting Self-Efficacy

The Live Happily part of the intervention promotes positive self images and boosts the self-esteem of young children. As a supplement to the academic curriculum in the schools, this program will have students do leadership building workshops, teamwork exercises, and personal discovery projects. Each week, teachers will dedicate one part of their lesson to working with their students and helping them build up character and self-esteem. Activities will include creative writing, leadership seminars, and trust building games. Health models look at communities as experts and in this case, it is the schoolchildren that understand what appeals to them and what influences their decisions (15). Giving them the right to make their own decisions and engage in the LEAP Ahead program with their peers will lead to a higher percentage of schoolchildren making positive decisions to change their behavior. A result of this part of the intervention will be the creation of self-efficacy among the schoolchildren.

Promoting a positive self image and creating self-efficacy among schoolchildren is a key component of this intervention because it is the foundation required to motivate a change in behavior (27). Empowering young children and making them feel like they have the ability to make positive health decisions makes the other components of this intervention more feasible. With self-efficacy in place, schoolchildren can make decisions about improving their dietary intake and physical fitness (4). They will feel empowered and realize that they are capable of taking on challenges and living happy and healthy lives.

Eat Healthily: Framing Obesity in a Way that Stimulates Balanced Diets

Using the school lunch program, the Eat Healthily component of the intervention can have the school cafeterias offer well balanced meals to the students during lunch time. One major component of this will be to eliminate sugar sweetened beverages from the menu, especially since significant data suggests that these drinks are linked to obesity in children (33). Instead, there can be an increased emphasis on offering high quality food that is both appetizing and nutritious. Students will be each asked to keep a food journal, students will record what they eat and when both during and outside the school day. Based on the nutritional value and the appropriate quantity, which would be determined off the daily 2,000 calorie diet, students will receive points for healthy eating. The scoring will range from 0-5000 calories. Points will not be given and may even be deducted for students with too few or too many calories. At the end of each month, any student with a score between 1500-2500 will receive a prize as well as a commendation from the principal. Students consistently performing well will be given a special award at the end of the academic year.

This intervention frames obesity as a challenge. Students are challenged to eat healthy food and no child is framed to be a failure if they do not have the recommended calorie intake. Instead, they are invited to participate in the challenge the following month. Since the target population is schoolchildren, the intervention is framed in a way that they will be receptive to. Most children are inspired by challenges and become competitive when asked to complete a task with their peers (30). Unlike the Weight Report Cards, this LEAP Ahead intervention is aimed at empowering children without explicitly segregating children by weight. This is a key issue as weight discrimination has been noted to be as harmful as racial discrimination among individuals (34). Racism has implications of causing disparities in health care and causes stress among individuals that lead to more complicated medical issues (42). Similarly, the stigma and stress associated with weight discrimination can lead to a faster onset of weight related health disorders as well as more sever cases of obesity.

Actively Learn: Create an Intention to Change Behavior

The way interventions can create an intention to change behavior is by addressing the perceived susceptibility and perceived severity related to a behavior that is meant to be changed (15). For children, perceived susceptibility may not be as apparent since they may not be aware of the health issues associated with poor diet and obesity. It is essential to educate schoolchildren about risks associated with unhealthy eating patterns and lack of exercise. By going over the health risks and impairments associated with obesity, schoolchildren will be more inclined to want to take care of themselves since they will better understand the perceived severity associated with unhealthy lifestyles. As a result, they will be more receptive toward the LEAP Ahead program, which provides the dietary and physical activity aspects that will be emphasized in this part of the intervention. The Actively Learn part of the intervention will become a component of the health studies already built into the curriculum. Teachers will go over what it means to be obese and how students can avoid this health issue and maintain healthy lives.

Oftentimes, television is a method used by public health interventions to target youth and adolescent populations (38). However, it is very difficult to create an intention to change the behavior of watching television to becoming more active by simply airing something on the television for a few seconds (39). Instead, interventions created to target obesity must be consistent with the core values of being healthy and should provide visible and tangible alternatives to the sedentary lifestyle adopted by a majority of American youth. Evidence of this is provided by the Eat Well and Keep Moving Program, which effectively improved the dietary intake and reduced the amount of television watched by schoolchildren (40). The LEAP Ahead program incorporates this educational component of the program to not only raise awareness, but to also provide ready to use solutions to the problem.

Be Physically Fit: Framing Obesity in a Way that Stimulates Exercise

One of the major goals of the LEAP Ahead program is to make schoolchildren physically fit. The Be Physically Fit component of the intervention is meant to go hand in hand with the physical education department in the school. The school will be asked to implement a fitness program that consists of fun activities that target the major body systems, such as games that promote cardiovascular exercises. The activities will be varied and offered in random orders so that they keep the schoolchildren engaged and allow them to have fun while exercising. Unlike the Weight Report Cards, which created programs just for the obese children, the LEAP Ahead intervention offers this program to all of the students and is inclusive of all children. Thus, obesity is not being framed as problem for only a fraction of the children; instead, obesity is framed as a problem that everyone may be at risk for if they do not participate in exercises to improve their fitness.

Having this intervention in a school based setting allows students to embrace the program in a setting they are familiar with. When dealing with weight, framing this issue is very important. Since the topic is highly sensitive, it must be portrayed in a way that is respectful of emotions; if not, it can lead to unhealthy and disordered eating patterns among children. A study done by the Division of Adolescent and Young Adult Medicine at the Children's Hospital in Boston provided evidence that school-based interventions can both prevent obesity and reduce the incidence of eating disorders (38). In addition to this, making the intervention become part of the school day as a supplement to either recess or physical education reduces stigma attached to participating in fitness routines; instead, it transforms into something fun that schoolchildren want to engage in with their friends.

Weight Report Cards vs. LEAP Ahead

Although Weight Report Cards and LEAP Ahead are both interventions that are school-based and aimed at preventing obesity, they have key differences in their layout and implementation. Many of the successful behavior change models in public health have the component of self-efficacy (15). Studies have also shown that self-efficacy is needed to ensure the success of weight loss and healthy lifestyle programs (4). The LEAP Ahead program makes schoolchildren feel like they are capable to make choices that will lead to healthy lifestyles. Further, the promotion of self-efficacy is essential for the other components of the program, while require the student to make the right choices and take on the challenge to be healthy and physically fit. In addition to this, behavior change models state that there must be an intention to change before an individual changes his/her behavior. Also, other models show how social factors also impact whether or not an action will be carried out (15). Unlike the Weight Report Cards, the LEAP Ahead program goes beyond singling out obese children and challenges all of the students to excel in each of the components of the intervention without attaching any stigma to the participants. Finally, the Weight Report Cards had a major flaw as framing the problem of obesity as the individual’s fault and making the obese children feel like failures (5). The LEAP Ahead program frames obesity as a problem that all of the schoolchildren are challenged to overcome by eating balanced diets, exercising regularly, and making healthy life decisions. Thus, with each of these improvements, the LEAP Ahead program is expected to have a greater success rate than the Weight Report Cards.

Conclusion

The problem of obesity affects people of all ages throughout the United States. There have been many interventions laid out to combat this problem. However, many of these interventions have not proven to be successful due to limitations in their layouts. Thus, new interventions must be constructed that take social and environmental factors into consideration and create programs that motivate participation among communities. The Weight Report Cards made an effort to reduce the incidence of obesity; however, due to its drawbacks, namely failing to take social theories into consideration, it was not a successful intervention. The LEAP Ahead program addresses all of these shortcomings and is structured so that schoolchildren become empowered to make healthy life decisions. Similar multi-faceted school-based interventions are feasible for implementation in public schools can lead to increased awareness and can reduce the cases of obesity (35).
REFERENCES

1. Barlow SE, Dietz WH. Obesity evaluation and treatment: expert committee recommendation, Pediatrics. 1998; 103, 3.

2. Blome, Ron. "NBC News." In Arkansas report card, F may stand for fat. NBC. 20 July 2004.

3. "Childhood and Teenage Obesity Intervention Strategies." ExRx (Exercise Prescription) on the Net. 29 Mar. 2009 .

4. Clark, M.M., Abrams, D.B., Niaura, R.S., Eaton, C.A. and Rossi, J.S., 1991. Self-efficacy in weight management. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology 59, pp. 739–744.

5. Donvan, John, and Katie Hinman. "Nightline." Weight Grade on Report Cards Angers Parents. ABC. 27 Aug. 2007.

6. Feldman, Donna. "Childhood Obesity: Do Children Need "Weight Report Cards"? | The Diet Channel." Weight Loss, Diets, Nutrition & Exercise at The Diet Channel. 05 Apr. 2009 .

7. Mitchell, Terence R., and Marilyn E. Gist. "Self-Efficacy: A Theoretical Analysis of Its Determinants and Malleability." Academy of Management 17 (1992): 183-211. JSTOR.

8. Pieper K, Barlow SE, et. al. Obesity and Kansas City Kids (2003 Conference), Reardon Convention Center, Kansas City, Kansas.

9. Robinson TN. Reducing children's television viewing to prevent obesity: a randomized controlled trial. JAMA. 1999 Oct 27; 282(16):1561-7.

10. Skinner JD, Bounds W, Carruth BR, Ziegler P. Longitudinal calcium intake is negatively related to children's body fat indexes. J Am Diet Assoc. 2003 Dec;103(12):1626-31.

11. USDA (2005) Dietary Guidelines for Americans, vii-viii.

12. World Health Organization (2000) (PDF). Technical report series 894: Obesity: Preventing and managing the global epidemic.

13. Framing Emotional Response, by Kimberly Gross and Lisa D'Ambrosio Political Psychology 2004 International Society of Political Psychology.

14. Lawrence, Regina G. "Framing Obesity." The Harvard International of Press/Politics 9 (2004).

15. Edberg, Mark Cameron. Essentials of Health Behavior : Social and Behavioral Theory in Public Health. New York: Jones & Bartlett, Incorporated, 2007.

16. Journal of the American Dietetic Association volume 104, Issue 3, March 2004, pages 341 - 344. "School health report cards attempt to address the obesity epidemic." Lee M. Scheier.

17. National Center for Health Statistics, Prevalence of Overweight and Obesity Among Adults: United States, 1999–2000 (2003) Available at: http://www.cdc.gov/nchs/products/pubs/pubd/hestats/obese/obse99.htm.

18. Hedley, AA, Ogden, CL, Johnson, CL, Carroll, MD, Curtin, LR, Flegal, KM. Overweight and obesity among US children, adolescents, and adults, 1999-2002. JAMA 291:2847-50. 2004.

19. V.R. Chomitz, J. Collins, J. Kim, E. Kramer and R. McGowan, Promoting healthy weight among elementary school children via a health report card approach, Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med 157 (2003), pp. 765–772.

20. N.F. Krebs and M.S. Jacobson, American Academy of Pediatrics Committee on Nutrition. Prevention of Pediatric Overweight and Obesity, Pediatrics 112 (2003), pp. 424–430.

21. L. Scheier, Potential problems with school health report cards, J Am Diet Assoc (2004) (in press).

22. Center for Weight and Health at Berkeley, Guidelines for Collecting Heights and Weights on Children and Adolescents in School Settings (2003) Available at: http://www.cnr.berkeley.edu/cwh/resources/childrenandweight.shtml.

23. K. Davis and K.K. Christoffel, Obesity in preschool and school-age children. Treatment early and often may be best, Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med 148 (1994), pp. 1257–1261.

24. R.C. Klesges, L.M. Klesges, L.H. Eck and M.L. Shelton, A longitudinal analysis of accelerated weight gain in preschool children, Pediatrics 95 (1995), pp. 126–130.

25. M. Briggs, S. Safaii and D. Lane Beall, Nutrition services: An essential component of comprehensive school health programs (2004) Available at: http://www.eatright.org/Member/PolicyInitiatives/8474_8243.cfm.

26. Berman, Erica S. "Eating Behaviors : The relationship between eating self-efficacy and eating disorder symptoms in a non-clinical sample." ScienceDirect. 08 Apr. 2009.

27. Clark, D.B. Abrams and R.S. Niaura, Self-efficacy in weight management, Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology 59 (1991), pp. 739–744.

28. Strauss, Richard S. "Childhood Obesity and Self-Esteem." Pediatrics 15th ser. 105 (2000).

29. Whetstone, Lauren M., Susan L. Morrissey, and Doyle M. Cummings. "Children at Risk: The Association between Perceived Weight Status and Suicidal Thoughts and Attempts in Middle School Youth." Journal of School Health 77 (2007): 59-66.

30. Gortmaker SL, Peterson KE, Wiecha JL, Sobol AM, Dixit S, Fox MK, Laird N. Reducing obesity via a school-based interdisciplinary intervention among youth: Planet Health. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 1999 Apr; 153 (4): 409-18.

31. Wiecha JL, Sobol AM, Peterson KE, Gortmaker SL. Household television access: associations with screen time, reading and homework among youth. Ambulatory Pediatrics. 2001 Sept - Oct; 1(5): 244-251.

32. Austin SB, Gortmaker SL. Dieting and smoking initiation in early adolescent girls and boys: A prospective study. Am J Public Health. 2001 Mar; 91 (3): 446-50.

33. Ludwig DS, Peterson KE, Gortmaker SL. Relation between consumption of sugar sweetened drinks and childhood obesity: A prospective, observational analysis. Lancet. 2001 Feb 17; 357(9255):505-8.

34. Wang LY, Yang Q, Lowry R, Wechsler H. Economic Analysis of a School-Based Obesity Prevention Program. Obes Res. 2003 Nov; 11 (11): 1313-1324.

35. Wiecha JL, El Ayadi AM, Fuemmeler BF, Carter JE, Handler S, Johnson S, Strunk N, Korzek-Ramirez D, Gortmaker SL. Diffusion of an Integrated Health Education Program in an Urban School System: Planet Health. J Pediatr Psychol. 2004 Sept; 29: 467-474.

36. Cradock AL, Wiecha JL, Peterson KE, et al. Youth Recall and TriTrac Accelerometer Estimates of Physical Activity Levels. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2004 Mar; 36 (3): 525-532.

37. Boynton-Jarrett R, Thomas TN, Peterson KE, et al. Impact of Television Viewing Patterns on Fruit and Vegetable Consumption Among Adolescents. Pediatrics. 2004 Dec; 112: 1321-1326.

38. Austin SB, Field E, Wiecha J, Peterson KE, Gortmaker S. The impact of a school-based obesity prevention trial on disordered weight-control behaviors in early adolescent girls. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2005 Mar; 159(3):225-229.

39. Wiecha JL, Peterson KE, Ludwig DS, Kim J, Sobol A, Gortmaker SL.When Children Eat What They Watch: Impact of Television Viewing on Dietary Intake in Youth When Children Eat What They Watch. Arch Pediatr Adolec Med. 2006 Apr; 106(4): 436-42.

40. Gortmaker SL, Cheung LWY, Peterson KE, Chomitz G, Cradle JH, Fox MK, Bullock RB, Sobol AM, Colditz G, Field A, Laird N. Impact of a School-Based Interdisciplinary Intervention on Diet and Physical Activity Among Urban Primary School Children: Eat Well and Keep Moving. Archives of Pediatrics and Adolescent Medicine 1999; 153:975-83.

41. Chavarro JE, Peterson KE, Sobol AM, Wiecha JL, Gortmaker SL. Effects of a School-based Obesity-prevention Intervention on Menarche (United States). Cancer Causes Control. 2005 Dec; 16(10):1245-52.

42. Brondolo, Elizabeth, Linda Gallo, and Hector Myers. "Race, racism and health: disparities, mechanisms, and interventions." Journal of Behavioral Medicine.

43. Carter J, Wiecha J, Peterson K, Gortmaker S. Planet Health: An Interdisciplinary Curriculum for Teaching Middle School Nutrition and Physical Activity. Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics. 2001.